Opinion
No. 11-10006 D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00383-EJG
03-05-2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FRANCISCO MIGUEL ANGEL NAJERA-GORDILLO, a.k.a. Miguel Angel Gonzalez, Defendant - Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Edward J. Garcia, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2012
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
--------
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Francisco Miguel Angel Najera-Gordillo appeals from the 324-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1), and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Najera-Gordillo contends that the sentence imposed is substantively unreasonable. The record reflects that the district court considered Najera-Gordillo's arguments in mitigation and provided a well-reasoned analysis of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, before concluding that a sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines range was appropriate. The sentence is substantively reasonable under the totality of the circumstances and in light of the section 3553(a) sentencing factors. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).
AFFIRMED.