Opinion
22-6656
09-27-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES ROBERT LISENBY, a/k/a James Robert Ratliff, Defendant-Appellant.
James Robert Lisenby, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Bredenberg, Special Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: September 22, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:12-cr-00132-D-1)
James Robert Lisenby, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Bredenberg, Special Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
James Robert Lisenby appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Lisenby's motion. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 185 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lisenby, No. 5:12-cr-00132-D-1 (E.D. N.C. May 27, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED