From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 28, 1980
612 F.2d 1011 (5th Cir. 1980)

Opinion

No. 79-5404. Summary Calendar.

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir. R. 18.

February 28, 1980.

Donald B. Dailey, Jr., Corpus Christi, Tex. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

Anna E. Stool, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Owen D. Cox, Judge.

Before RONEY, KRAVITCH and TATE, Circuit Judges.



Appellant James Edward Johnson appeals his conviction for bond-jumping (willful failure to appear) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3150 (1966) alleging insufficiency of evidence to support the jury verdict.

Instead of a brief, the government has filed a Memorandum (confession of error), as follows:

"Counsel for Appellee has thoroughly examined the merits of Appellant James Edward Johnson's brief and has consulted at length with the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. After due deliberation and in light of the recommendation of the Department of Justice, the government has concluded that it will not oppose the granting of Johnson's claim for relief for the reasons stated in his appellate brief. See United States v. Callaway, 455 F.2d 523 (5th Cir. 1971)."

The judgment of conviction is

REVERSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 28, 1980
612 F.2d 1011 (5th Cir. 1980)
Case details for

United States v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JAMES EDWARD JOHNSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 28, 1980

Citations

612 F.2d 1011 (5th Cir. 1980)

Citing Cases

Voyles v. Watkins

It is the duty of court-appointed counsel to interview potential witnesses and to make an independent…