From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Graham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Apr 5, 2013
Criminal No. 12-268(2) (JNE/JSM) (D. Minn. Apr. 5, 2013)

Opinion

Criminal No. 12-268(2) (JNE/JSM)

04-05-2013

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Quentin Graham, Defendant.


ORDER

In a Report and Recommendation dated March 25, 2013, the Honorable Janie S. Mayeron, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Quentin Graham's Motion for Suppression of Electronic Surveillance and Wiretapping be denied as moot, Motion for Suppression of Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure be denied, and Motion to Suppress Admissions or Confessions be denied as moot. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 78]. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Graham's Motion for Suppression of Electronic Surveillance and Wiretapping [Docket No. 48] is DENIED AS MOOT.
2. Graham's Motion for Suppression of Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure [Docket No. 49] is DENIED.
3. Graham's Motion to Suppress Admissions or Confessions [Docket No. 50] is DENIED AS MOOT.

_____________________

JOAN N. ERICKSEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Graham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Apr 5, 2013
Criminal No. 12-268(2) (JNE/JSM) (D. Minn. Apr. 5, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Quentin Graham, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Apr 5, 2013

Citations

Criminal No. 12-268(2) (JNE/JSM) (D. Minn. Apr. 5, 2013)