From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Freeman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Aug 7, 2014
No. 13-6497 (6th Cir. Aug. 7, 2014)

Summary

relying on Mitchell to hold that robbery under Tennessee law was categorically a crime of violence

Summary of this case from Henley v. United States

Opinion

No. 13-6497

08-07-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STONEY FREEMAN, JR., Defendant-Appellant.


NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
File Name: 14a0605n.06
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE BEFORE: COOK and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and RICE, District Judge.

The Honorable Walter H. Rice, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM. Stoney Freeman, Jr. pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 924(a) and (e). The sole question raised in this appeal is whether the district court erred in holding that Freeman's 2008 Tennessee conviction for robbery constituted a "crime of violence" under U.S.S.G. §§ 4B1.2(a) and 2K2.1(a)(4)(A), resulting in a base offense level of 20 and a heightened advisory guidelines range of 46 to 57 months. The district court ultimately imposed a below-guidelines sentence of 40 months' imprisonment.

We review de novo the district court's determination that a prior offense qualifies as a "crime of violence" under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Evans, 699 F.3d 858, 862 (6th Cir. 2012). Recently, in United States v. Mitchell, 743 F.3d 1054 (6th Cir. 2014), petition for certiorari filed (U.S. June 18, 2014) (No. 13-10682), our court engaged in a comprehensive analysis of the very same robbery statute at issue here, Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-401, and held that it is categorically a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act ("ACCA"), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Because "[a] 'crime of violence' under the career-offender provision is interpreted identically to a 'violent felony' under [the] ACCA," United States v. Johnson, 707 F.3d 655, 659 n.2 (6th Cir. 2013), Mitchell is, as Freeman readily concedes (see Appellant's Reply Brief at v.), controlling authority which we are bound to follow. See United States v. Huntley, ___ F. App'x ___, 2014 WL 3015020, at *1 (6th Cir. July 7, 2014) (unpublished) (citing "Mitchell's controlling force" in holding that Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-401 "is a crime of violence under the Sentencing Guidelines too"). Therefore, Freeman's prior conviction was properly deemed a "crime of violence" by the district court, and there was no error in the court's sentencing calculations.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment.


Summaries of

United States v. Freeman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Aug 7, 2014
No. 13-6497 (6th Cir. Aug. 7, 2014)

relying on Mitchell to hold that robbery under Tennessee law was categorically a crime of violence

Summary of this case from Henley v. United States
Case details for

United States v. Freeman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STONEY FREEMAN, JR.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 7, 2014

Citations

No. 13-6497 (6th Cir. Aug. 7, 2014)

Citing Cases

Henley v. United States

Counsel's failure to challenge Petitioner's career offender designation based on the process outlined in…