From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Flores

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 8, 1984
732 F.2d 1438 (9th Cir. 1984)

Opinion

No. 82-1445.

May 8, 1984.

Carla M. Woehrle, Talcott, Vandevelde Woehrle, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

William Fahey, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment, 729 F.2d 593, is withdrawn.


Summaries of

United States v. Flores

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 8, 1984
732 F.2d 1438 (9th Cir. 1984)
Case details for

United States v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. VIRGILIO PATRICIO FLORES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 8, 1984

Citations

732 F.2d 1438 (9th Cir. 1984)

Citing Cases

United States v. Alkhafaji

Since this appeal was filed the Ninth Circuit has vacated its panel decision in Flores and granted rehearing…