From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Erwin

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Mar 6, 1996
78 F.3d 232 (6th Cir. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-1766.

Decided and Filed March 6, 1996

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KENNEDY, MARTIN, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, and COLE, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the grunting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.


Summaries of

United States v. Erwin

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Mar 6, 1996
78 F.3d 232 (6th Cir. 1996)
Case details for

United States v. Erwin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES ERWIN, JR.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Mar 6, 1996

Citations

78 F.3d 232 (6th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Sullivan

On the one hand, because the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit agreed that once the reason…

U.S. v. Erwin

When we granted the government's petition for en banc review, we vacated the judgment of the panel of this…