Summary
concluding that items seized were not seized under provisions of the warrant challenged as overly broad, and, therefore, there was no basis to suppress those items
Summary of this case from United States v. HydeOpinion
CASE NO. 14-20159-CR-MORENO
06-25-2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EDWIDGE JUNIOR DERBOUZE, Defendant.
ORDER ADPOPTING REPORT and RECOMMENDATION
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon defendant's motion to suppress statements and physical evidence [D.E. #29] and the Court having referred said motion to United States Magistrate Judge John O'Sullivan and having received a Report and Recommendation [D.E. #31] and after a de novo review of the transcript, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and the motion to suppress is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED in Miami-Dade County Florida this 25th day of June, 2014.
__________
FEDERICO A. MORENO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to: All counsel of record