From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Conley

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 3, 2016
No. 15-50347 (9th Cir. Oct. 3, 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-50347

10-03-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CASEY CONLEY, Defendant-Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 3:14-cr-01464-BEN MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California
Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Casey Conley appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 180-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Conley contends that the district court erred by failing to consider the parties' recommendation for a three-level, fast track departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K3.1, and by denying the government's recommendation for a six-level departure for substantial assistance pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e). The record reflects that the district court considered both the fast track and substantial assistance recommendations, and determined that a total one-level reduction was appropriate. See United States v. Evans-Martinez, 611 F.3d 635, 643 (9th Cir. 2010) ("A district court's decision to grant [a substantial assistance] motion does not bind the court . . . to stay at the level recommended by the government.").

To the extent Conley challenges the district court's discretionary decisions regarding the fast track and substantial assistance departures, our review is limited to determining whether the court imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. See United States v. Ellis, 641 F.3d 411, 421 (9th Cir. 2011). The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Conley's sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Conley's extensive criminal history. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Conley

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 3, 2016
No. 15-50347 (9th Cir. Oct. 3, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Conley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CASEY CONLEY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 3, 2016

Citations

No. 15-50347 (9th Cir. Oct. 3, 2016)

Citing Cases

Conley v. United States

Petitioner appealed his sentence, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed. See United States v. Conley, 669 Fed. App'x…