From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. City of Blue Ash, Ohio

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 15, 1980
621 F.2d 227 (6th Cir. 1980)

Opinion

No. 78-3177.

April 15, 1980.

Robert T. McConaughy, Dinsmore, Shohl, Coates Deupree, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants-appellants.

James C. Cissell, U.S. Atty., and Gerald F. Kaminski, Asst. U.S. Atty., Cincinnati, Ohio, Barbara B. O'Malley, Larry Moore, Barbara Allen Babcock, Morton Hollander, Eloise E. Davies, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CELEBREZZE and BROWN, Circuit Judges, PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER

This is an appeal of a grant of summary judgment by the district court to the United States (on cross-motions for summary judgment) in an action brought by the government to enjoin enforcement of an ordinance of the City of Blue Ash, Ohio prescribing the course to be taken by aircraft when taking off from the Cincinnati — Blue Ash Airport.

Upon consideration, the court is of the opinion that the decision of the district judge, Honorable Timothy S. Hogan, is correct for reasons stated in his memorandum filed February 7, 1978, 487 F. Supp. 135.

It is therefore Ordered that the judgment of the district court be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. City of Blue Ash, Ohio

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 15, 1980
621 F.2d 227 (6th Cir. 1980)
Case details for

United States v. City of Blue Ash, Ohio

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. THE CITY OF BLUE ASH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 15, 1980

Citations

621 F.2d 227 (6th Cir. 1980)

Citing Cases

Blue Sky Entertainment v. Gardiner

In fact, federal law in the area of aviation is so pervasive that it preempts a municipal ordinance which…

State v. Collins

Therefore, it is clear that Congress has not expressly preempted the field. Nor has Congress impliedly…