From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cantu

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 18, 1977
548 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-1785. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

March 18, 1977.

Pedro P. Garcia, Corpus Christi, Tex. (Court-appointed), for Cantu.

L. Aron Pena, Edinburg, Tex., for Bryant.

Edward B. McDonough, Jr., U.S. Atty., Anna E. Stool, George A. Kelt, Jr., Robert A. Berg, James R. Gough, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Before GOLDBERG, CLARK and FAY, Circuit Judges.



Defendants were stopped for a citizenship check at the permanent checkpoint near Falfurrias, Texas. During the questioning, the Border Patrol officer noticed a suspicious configuration of the quilt covering the rear seat of their vehicle and detected the odor of marijuana. A search of the vehicle revealed approximately 200 pounds of marijuana in the back seat and trunk.

Stopping a vehicle at a permanent checkpoint to determine citizenship does not offend the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1976). The visual observations and odor detected gave the officer probable cause to search defendants' car. United States v. Torres, 537 F.2d 1299 (5th Cir. 1976).

Defendants made incriminating statements after they had twice been advised of their constitutional rights, both in English and Spanish. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The district court conducted a hearing, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3501 (1970), to determine the voluntariness of defendants' statements and found that their statements were voluntary. Accordingly, the district court permitted testimony concerning the statements to be admitted as evidence to the jury. The jury was properly instructed on voluntariness as well as the applicability of 18 U.S.C. § 3501 (1970). The judgments of conviction and sentences appealed from are

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Cantu

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 18, 1977
548 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1977)
Case details for

United States v. Cantu

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ABIGAIL RIVERA CANTU AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 18, 1977

Citations

548 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1977)

Citing Cases

United States v. Jackson

It makes no difference that an important fact establishing probable cause was a noise. Probable cause can be…

United States v. Colon-Padilla

We further conclude that the facts, as thus found by the district court, support its conclusion that…