From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States, for use of United States Rubber Co., v. Ambursen Dam Co.

United States District Court, N.D. California, N.D
May 4, 1933
3 F. Supp. 548 (N.D. Cal. 1933)

Opinion

No. 743.

May 4, 1933.

Willard P. Smith, Robert B. Gaylord, and Ervin S. Best, all of San Francisco, Cal., for claimants.

Thomas, Beedy, Presley Paramore, Knight, Boland Christin, and Knight, Boland Riordan, all of San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.



The Honorable William A. Beasley, appointed as special master in the above-entitled cause, has at my request prepared an abridgment of the two opinions he filed herein. It states fully and clearly the legal principles upon which I overruled the exceptions to the master's report, and, for purposes of publication, I herewith adopt it as the opinion of the court in ruling upon said exceptions.


Summaries of

United States, for use of United States Rubber Co., v. Ambursen Dam Co.

United States District Court, N.D. California, N.D
May 4, 1933
3 F. Supp. 548 (N.D. Cal. 1933)
Case details for

United States, for use of United States Rubber Co., v. Ambursen Dam Co.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES, For Use of UNITED STATES RUBBER CO. et al. v. AMBURSEN DAM…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, N.D

Date published: May 4, 1933

Citations

3 F. Supp. 548 (N.D. Cal. 1933)

Citing Cases

United States v. Seaboard Surety Co.

" In United States for the Use of United States Rubber Co. et al. v. Ambursen Dam Co. et al., D.C., N.D.Cal.,…

U.S. for the Use, Sunbelt Pipe v. U.S. Fidel

That may be, but the pipe, after fabrication, still has substantial economic value for one wishing to use it…