Summary
reversing and remanding for the trial court to identify the necessary steps for the parent to reestablish unsupervised timesharing with child where the final judgment restricted timesharing to supervised contact one time per week
Summary of this case from Solomon v. SolomonOpinion
No. 3D15–671.
01-27-2016
Iehuda TZYNDER, Appellant, v. Keren EDELSBURG, Appellee.
Nancy A. Hass, Hollywood, for appellant. Kahn, Lewen & Resnik and Greg A. Lewen and Marcy S. Resnik, Dania, for appellee.
Nancy A. Hass, Hollywood, for appellant.
Kahn, Lewen & Resnik and Greg A. Lewen and Marcy S. Resnik, Dania, for appellee.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Iehuda Tzynder appeals from a final judgment modifying parental responsibility and timesharing. We affirm the final judgment in all respects, save one: the final judgment modifies Tzynder's timesharing with the minor child by restricting contact to one time per week, and requires that all contact with and access to the minor child be in a supervised setting. However, the final judgment fails to identify what steps Tzynder must take in order to reestablish unsupervised timesharing. On remand, the trial court shall amend the final judgment to identify the necessary steps which Tzynder must take in order to reestablish unsupervised timesharing with the parties' minor child. See Hunter v. Hunter, 540 So.2d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Perez v. Fay, 160 So.3d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.