From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tyner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 6, 1978
363 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. KK-419.

November 6, 1978.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Marion County, William T. Swigert, J.

Bradford Tyner, in pro. per.

No appearance for appellee.


Appeal from a denial of a motion to vacate a judgment and sentence, pursuant to Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P. Appellant contends that a substitute judge sentenced him without becoming familiar with the case and that, therefore, the sentence is invalid.

This issue could have been raised on direct appeal and, thus, cannot be raised with a motion to vacate or set aside a judgment and conviction. Von Eberstein v. State, 270 So.2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). Accordingly, the order of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C.J., and ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tyner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 6, 1978
363 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Tyner v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRADFORD TYNER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 6, 1978

Citations

363 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Walcott v. State

Villery v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 1981), as to jail confinement), and…

McCrae v. State

The purpose of the Rule 3.850 motion is to provide a means of inquiry into the alleged constitutional…