From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tyler v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Apr 18, 2000
18 S.W.3d 117 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED75368.

April 18, 2000.

APPEAL FROM MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; HON. JOAN MORIARTY, JUDGE.

Douglas Hoff, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON, Krista D. Boston, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Mary Rhodes Russell, C.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and Charles Blackmar, Sr. J.



ORDER


Melvin Leroy Tyler ("Movant") appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 27.26 motion to vacate, set aside or correct his judgment and sentence without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 27.26(j). An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Tyler v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Apr 18, 2000
18 S.W.3d 117 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Tyler v. State

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN LEROY TYLER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Apr 18, 2000

Citations

18 S.W.3d 117 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Tyler v. State

Id. Additionally, Appellant's pro se motion for post-conviction relief and request for evidentiary hearing,…

Tyler v. State

In 1987, Movant filed his pro se motion for post-conviction relief (PCR motion), pursuant to Rule 27.26, the…