From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

T.V. v. Dept. of Children

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 22, 2005
905 So. 2d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

holding that the standard of review where a trial court terminates parental rights is whether the order is supported by competent, substantial evidence

Summary of this case from K.E. v. Dep't of Children & Families (In re C.E.)

Opinion

No. 3D04-32.

June 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, Seymour Gelber, J.

Ivy R. Ginsberg, Miami, for appellant.

Hillary S. Kambour; and Calianne P. Lantz, Miami, for appellee.

Before LEVY, C.J., and RAMIREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.


T.V., the natural mother, appeals the trial court's order terminating her parental rights as to her three children, pursuant to section 39.01(45), Florida Statutes (2002). We find clear and convincing evidence that the mother's continuing involvement with the children threaten the children's lives or future well-being pursuant to section 39.806(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2002), and therefore affirm the trial court's findings and conclusions.

The standard of review in a case where the trial court terminates parental rights is whether the judgment is supported by substantial and competent evidence. See F.A.F. v. Dep't of Children and Family Servs., 804 So.2d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). To justify a termination of parental rights, the department has the burden of proof to present clear and convincing evidence that a parent has abused, neglected or abandoned a child, or that the child is at substantial risk of future abuse, neglect, or abandonment. See E.K.B. v. Dep't of Children and Families, 724 So.2d 720, 721 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

We determine that the record evidence and trial testimony proves well beyond the clear and convincing standard of proof that the mother in this case suffers from a serious condition that renders her incapable of safely caring for her children, and poses a danger to the lives and future well-being of the children. The record demonstrates that the mother has a history of serious mental health problems. The mother has been Baker Acted at least twice, taken Prozac and Zanax medications, and written a suicide note. The record also shows that the mother has engaged in egregious conduct and demonstrated violent tendencies. She threatened family members with knives on more than one occasion, including her own mother and the father of one of the children. At the time of trial, the mother was incarcerated on charges related to these incidents. The mother likewise threatened to kill herself and the children. There is testimony that the mother twice threw a pillow at one of her children at a time during which the child was only a few months old. She admitted that she gets tense and lashes out whenever she is stressed.

The evidence further demonstrates that the mother's risk of future neglect is high and it is unlikely that the mother's mental health situation will change in the near future. The mother attended only three out of eight previously recommended visits to a mental health counselor. The mother believes that she does not need services because she was in "perfect condition," and not a bad mother. She stated that her "major counselor is called Jesus Christ."

Affirmed.


Summaries of

T.V. v. Dept. of Children

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 22, 2005
905 So. 2d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

holding that the standard of review where a trial court terminates parental rights is whether the order is supported by competent, substantial evidence

Summary of this case from K.E. v. Dep't of Children & Families (In re C.E.)

holding that the standard of review where a trial court terminates parental rights is whether the order is supported by competent, substantial evidence

Summary of this case from C.E. v. Dep't of Children & Families & Gardian Ad Litem Program

holding that the standard of review where a trial court terminates parental rights on the basis of egregious conduct is whether the order is supported by competent substantial evidence

Summary of this case from K.R.L. v. Dep't of Children & Family Servs.
Case details for

T.V. v. Dept. of Children

Case Details

Full title:T.V., Appellant, v. DEP'T. OF CHILDREN FAMILY SERVICES, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 22, 2005

Citations

905 So. 2d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

I.D. v. Dept. of Children

In the termination of parental rights, DCF has the burden to prove by clear and convincing evidence abuse,…

R.T. v. Fla. Dep't of Children & Families

Because the trial court's findings are supported by competent substantial evidence, we affirm. T.V. v. Dep't…