From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 10, 1993
623 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 93-1209.

September 10, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lake County, Jerry T. Lockett, J.

Edward L. Turner, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


The appellant, Edward Turner pled guilty to capital sexual battery, a "life felony." He was sentenced, pursuant to agreement, to 40 years incarceration followed by life probation. This sentence, as conceded by the state, exceeds the statutory maximum. Taylor v. State, 573 So.2d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

The error here was the imposition by the trial court of a probationary split sentence instead of a true split sentence. See Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1988). The latter is lawful but the former is not, where, as here, the incarcerative portion of the split sentence is 40 years for a life felony. The trial court may, upon remand, impose a sentence of life incarceration, suspended after serving 40 years of incarceration, with the balance of the sentence thereafter to be served on probation. This is the sentence that was bargained for. See generally, Wood v. State, 582 So.2d 751 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (resentence consistent with original sentencing plan is not vindictive).

The sentence is reversed and the case is remanded for resentencing.

PETERSON, J., concurs.

W. SHARP, J., concurs in result only, with opinion.


There is something illogical about saying a sentence of forty years followed by life probation is illegal because it exceeds the statutory maximum (forty years or a life sentence), but a sentence to prison for life suspended after forty years followed by life probation, is lawful. In substance and reality, the two are identical, and will have an identical impact on Turner. One is hard pressed to explain the difference to him with a straight face. Since we are apparently bound by Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1988), I concur in this case with reluctance.

To quote Charles Dickens (Mr. Bumble commenting on the law): If that be the law, "the law is an ass — an idiot. . . ." (Oliver Twist, Chapter 51)."


Summaries of

Turner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 10, 1993
623 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Turner v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD L. TURNER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 10, 1993

Citations

623 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Sumner v. State

We agree. See Wilson v. State, 622 So.2d 529 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Turner v. State, 623 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 5th…

Holloway v. State

See State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla. 1978). For example, in Dyer v. State, 629 So.2d 285 (Fla. 5th DCA…