From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 14, 1984
444 So. 2d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Summary

ruling that information was null and void because it was signed by an imposter who was posing as an assistant state attorney

Summary of this case from Dixon v. State

Opinion

Nos. 82-1350, 83-2011.

December 27, 1983. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing February 14, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Howard Gross, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Michael J. Neimand and Richard E. Doran, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and JORGENSON, JJ.


One Gregory Lattimer purporting to be a member of the Florida Bar secured a position as an assistant state attorney. While he was employed, he signed as "assistant state attorney" an information charging the appellant with the crime of burglary, which allegedly occurred between December 1, 1981 and January 4, 1982. The appellant was ultimately convicted and an appeal seeking review of this conviction is presently pending under clerk's file numbered 82-1350. That appeal was dismissed by this court in June 1982 for failure to file appellant's brief without prejudice to seek a belated appeal pursuant to Baggett v. Wainwright, 229 So.2d 239 (Fla. 1970). The appeal was reinstated by this court on August 6, 1982. During the period in which the aforementioned appeal was dismissed, the appellant filed in the trial court a motion to vacate pursuant to Rule 3.850 Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which was denied. That order is the subject matter of an appeal pending under clerk's file numbered 83-2011.

We find that the original information was a nullity and void, having been filed by an "imposter" posing as an assistant state attorney, therefore the trial court erred in denying the Rule 3.850 motion and we hereby reverse this order of denial and do hereby vacate the original conviction and sentence and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. See and Compare: Dobson v. State, 434 So.2d 332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

It is conceded that Lattimer was an "imposter" and that this fact was not known to the state or defense until after Turner's trial.

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Turner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 14, 1984
444 So. 2d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

ruling that information was null and void because it was signed by an imposter who was posing as an assistant state attorney

Summary of this case from Dixon v. State
Case details for

Turner v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL TURNER, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 14, 1984

Citations

444 So. 2d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Dixon v. State

See 41 Am.Jur.2d Indictments and Informations § 144 at 757 (1995)("any substantial misnomer in either the…

Byrd v. State

The rule exists because this is the type of defect which could readily be cured if timely raised in the trial…