holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to collect money damages from any of the state defendants because he failed to allege that they were being sued personally rather than in their official capacities as state employees; citing Will and Wells
Summary of this case from Moore v. City of HarrimanNo. 89-1656
May 22, 1990.
Appeal from the E.D.Mich.
REVERSED.
holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to collect money damages from any of the state defendants because he failed to allege that they were being sued personally rather than in their official capacities as state employees; citing Will and Wells
Summary of this case from Moore v. City of HarrimanFull title:Trustees of Asbestos Workers Local Union No. 25 Ins. Trust Fund v. Metro…
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: May 22, 1990
e showing of jurisdiction with respect to these defendants"); See v. Collins, 911 F.2d 733, 1990 WL 120959,…
U.S. Bank v. RobertsonNext, relying on Mantley v. Buckantz, the Robertsons contend that the state courts lacked subject matter…