From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trost v. Trost

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 8, 2012
Case No. 1:09-cv-580 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 8, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-cv-580

03-08-2012

SHERRY TROST, Plaintiff, v. ZACHARY TROST, et al., Defendants.


Hon. Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr.


JUDGMENT

This action was tried by a jury with Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr. presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. In accordance with that verdict, as modified by the Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law filed pursuant to F.R.C.P. 50(a) and entered this date,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:


1. That plaintiff takes nothing on Count I (breach of contract).
2. That plaintiff takes nothing on Count III (fraud).
3. That plaintiff is entitled to judgment on Count V (common law conversion) against both defendant Zachary Trost and Kim Trost in the amount of $108,797.06, with interest thereon and costs of action as provided by law.

____________

HUGH W. BRENNEMAN, JR.

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Trost v. Trost

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 8, 2012
Case No. 1:09-cv-580 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Trost v. Trost

Case Details

Full title:SHERRY TROST, Plaintiff, v. ZACHARY TROST, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 8, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:09-cv-580 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 8, 2012)

Citing Cases

Trost v. Trost (In re Trost)

In re Trost, 164 B.R. at 749. The judgment obtained by Buckstop and the revocation of Fred Trost's discharge…