From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trentadue v. Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 19, 2006
475 Mich. 906 (Mich. 2006)

Opinion

Nos. 128579, 128623-128625.

July 19, 2006.


Leave to Appeal Granted.

The parties are directed to include among the issues to be briefed whether the Court of Appeals application of a common-law discovery rule to determine when plaintiffs claims accrued is inconsistent with or contravenes MCL 600.5827, and whether previous decisions of this Court, which have recognized and applied such a rule when MCL 600.5827 would otherwise control, should be overruled. Reported below: 266 Mich App 297.


Summaries of

Trentadue v. Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 19, 2006
475 Mich. 906 (Mich. 2006)
Case details for

Trentadue v. Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler Co.

Case Details

Full title:TRENTADUE v. BUCKLER AUTOMATIC LAWN SPRINKLER COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jul 19, 2006

Citations

475 Mich. 906 (Mich. 2006)

Citing Cases

Schaendorf v. Consumers Enrgy

Indeed, the Court has granted leave to consider whether the common-law discovery rule remains viable in light…

Trentadue v. Buckler

Defendants appealed, and we granted leave, directing the parties to include among the issues to be briefed:…