From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Traylor Brothers v. Melvin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 20, 2000
776 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

denying attorney’s fees to a prevailing party because the "indemnification clauses in the Lease Agreement d[ id] not provide for an award of attorney’s fees to the prevailing party in litigation between the contracting parties"

Summary of this case from Int'l Fid. Ins. Co. v. Americaribe-Moriarty JV

Opinion

No. 1D99-3058.

Opinion filed December 20, 2000. Rehearing Denied February 15, 2001.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County, Thomas T. Remington, Judge.

Affirmed in part; Reversed in part and Remanded.

F. Alan Cummings, Patricia A. Snyder and Alejandro Espino of Cummings Snyder, P.A., Tallahassee, Attorneys for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Daniel C. O'Rourke of Matthews Hawkins, P.A., Destin, Attorney for Appellees/Cross-Appellants.


This is an appeal and cross-appeal of a Final Judgment in a breach of contract action, arising out of a Lease Agreement between the parties. Appellant leased property owned by Appellees to use as a site for bridge construction in Okaloosa County. We affirm all issues on appeal except the trial court's finding that Appellees are entitled to attorney's fees based on a provision in the Lease Agreement. The indemnification clauses in the Lease Agreement do not provide for an award of attorney's fees to the prevailing party in litigation between the contracting parties. Accordingly, Appellees are not entitled to an award of attorney's fees. See Penthouse North Ass'n, Inc. v. Lombardi, 461 So.2d 1350 (Fla. 1984).

On cross-appeal, we reverse and remand for a determination of damages to be awarded to Appellees for the removal of the remaining equipment foundation on the property. The record does not contain competent, sufficient evidence to support the trial court's explanation on rehearing that the Final Judgment includes damages yet to be incurred by Appellees. Therefore, we reverse and remand for a determination of future damages. We also reverse the trial court's determination that Appellant is required to pay reasonable and necessary attorney's fees to Appellees.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

BOOTH, MINER and KAHN, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Traylor Brothers v. Melvin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 20, 2000
776 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

denying attorney’s fees to a prevailing party because the "indemnification clauses in the Lease Agreement d[ id] not provide for an award of attorney’s fees to the prevailing party in litigation between the contracting parties"

Summary of this case from Int'l Fid. Ins. Co. v. Americaribe-Moriarty JV
Case details for

Traylor Brothers v. Melvin

Case Details

Full title:TRAYLOR BROTHERS, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. JARRETT G. MELVIN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 20, 2000

Citations

776 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Kirsch v. Brightstar Corp.

The Eleventh Circuit, interpreting Florida law, has explained that where an indemnification clause in a…

Int'l Fid. Ins. Co. v. Americaribe-Moriarty JV

The Florida Supreme Court rejected the directors’ request for attorney’s fees based on an indemnification…