From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Townsend v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 23, 1976
330 So. 2d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 75-476.

April 23, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, Wallace Sample, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Craig S. Barnard, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paul H. Zacks, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Since the automobile in which the contraband was found was not in the exclusive possession of appellant, a passenger therein, knowledge of its presence cannot be inferred but must be established by proof. Frank v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 199 So.2d 117. The proof in this record is circumstantial and in our judgment does not rise to that quality necessary to exclude a reasonable hypothesis of innocence; therefore appellant's motion for a judgment of acquittal on the charge of possession of a controlled substance should have been granted.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed from are reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to discharge appellant.

CROSS, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Townsend v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 23, 1976
330 So. 2d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Townsend v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHELLY TOWNSEND, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 23, 1976

Citations

330 So. 2d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Murphy v. State

As previously indicated, this court has consistently held that when contraband is found in a vehicle which is…

Green v. State

when contraband is found in a vehicle which is in the possession of two or more persons, circumstantial…