Summary
affirming district court's denial of habeas relief on bail claim when available state remedies had not been exhausted
Summary of this case from Goicochea v. ConwayOpinion
No. 71-2950. Summary Calendar.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
February 4, 1972.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5th Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.
Petitioner, a state prisoner, applied to the district court for habeas corpus relief, asserting that he had been denied a preliminary hearing and that his bail was excessive. The district court denied relief because petitioner had failed to exhaust available state remedies.