From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tinner v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Jun 8, 2016
194 So. 3d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 3D15–2746.

06-08-2016

Walter Lee TINNER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Walter Lee Tinner, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General.


Walter Lee Tinner, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General.

Before ROTHENBERG, EMAS, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

Opinion

ROTHENBERG, J.

We find no error and affirm the portion of the trial court's order finding good cause to prohibit the defendant from filing any further pro se pleadings, motions, or petitions related to his convictions and sentencing in circuit court case number 92–16967, and directing the clerk of the circuit court to refuse to accept further filings by the defendant unless they have been reviewed and signed by a duly licensed attorney and member of the Florida Bar in good standing. However, to the extent that the trial court's order can be read to have also ordered forfeiture of twenty-five percent of the defendant's accumulated gain time, we reverse. While the trial court may recommend such a sanction, it cannot itself order the Department of Corrections to impose such a sanction. See § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2015) ; Isom v. State, 43 So.3d 776 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) ; Hall v. State, 752 So.2d 575 (Fla.2000).

Affirmed in part; and reversed in part for correction of the order consistent with this opinion.


Summaries of

Tinner v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Jun 8, 2016
194 So. 3d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Tinner v. State

Case Details

Full title:Walter Lee Tinner, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Jun 8, 2016

Citations

194 So. 3d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)