From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan 30, 2019
264 So. 3d 1080 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 3D18-611

01-30-2019

Luis THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender and James A. Odell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General and Keri T. Joseph, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender and James A. Odell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General and Keri T. Joseph, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Grady v. State 753 So.2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (Factors to be considered in determining whether an object is drug paraphernalia include "the proximity of the object to controlled substances" and "expert testimony concerning its use.").


Summaries of

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan 30, 2019
264 So. 3d 1080 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Thomas v. State

Case Details

Full title:Luis THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jan 30, 2019

Citations

264 So. 3d 1080 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)