From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2013
Case No. ED CV 12-762 MRW (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2013)

Summary

finding any error in failing to address testimony from claimant's daughter harmless when her testimony offered no new evidence and was merely duplicative of claimant's

Summary of this case from Romo v. Colvin

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 12-762 MRW

03-27-2013

KEESHA L. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

The decision of the Administrative Law Judge is AFFIRMED. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant.

______________________

HON. MICHAEL R. WILNER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Thomas v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2013
Case No. ED CV 12-762 MRW (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2013)

finding any error in failing to address testimony from claimant's daughter harmless when her testimony offered no new evidence and was merely duplicative of claimant's

Summary of this case from Romo v. Colvin

finding any error in failing to address testimony from claimant's daughter harmless when her testimony offered no new evidence and was merely duplicative of claimant's

Summary of this case from Ornelas v. Colvin
Case details for

Thomas v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:KEESHA L. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

Case No. ED CV 12-762 MRW (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2013)

Citing Cases

Romo v. Colvin

Moreover, the failure to address cumulative lay testimony that does not introduce new evidence is harmless…

Ornelas v. Colvin

JS at 26. Nevertheless, the failure to address cumulative lay testimony that does not introduce new evidence…