Summary
denying leave to file amicus brief on grounds that the "information provided in the brief is untimely since it comes almost two years after this action was commenced and several months after the parties completed briefing their Cross Motions for Summary Judgment."
Summary of this case from National Ass'n of Optometrists & Opticians v. LockyerOpinion
CIVIL ACTION No. 96-114 97-187.
July 15, 1998
ORDER
THIS MATTER having been raised by Defendants' in their July 15, 1998 letter;
The Court having reviewed its July 2, 1998 Opinion;
It is on this 15th day of July, 1998 HEREBY ORDERED that the first word of paragraph 73 of the Court's Findings of Fact, located on page 19 of the Opinion, shall be changed from "Defendants" to "Plaintiffs'". Paragraph 73 will now read:
73. Plaintiffs' argument with respect to the Sea Turtles is that the Project has or will modify and degrade the Sea Turtles' habitat in a way that adversely affects its feeding and sheltering patterns by causing increased sediment runoff and discharge of partially treated sewage effluent into Vessup Bay.