From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Texas v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 11, 2020
141 S. Ct. 1230 (2020)

Opinion

No. 155, Original.

12-11-2020

TEXAS, Plaintiff v. PENNSYLVANIA, et al.


The State of Texas's motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot. Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California , 589 U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 684, 206 L.Ed.2d 175 (2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.


Summaries of

Texas v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 11, 2020
141 S. Ct. 1230 (2020)
Case details for

Texas v. Pennsylvania

Case Details

Full title:TEXAS, Plaintiff v. PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States.

Date published: Dec 11, 2020

Citations

141 S. Ct. 1230 (2020)
208 L. Ed. 2d 487

Citing Cases

Wis. Voters All. v. Pence

Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 168.46. Plaintiffs’ theory that all of these laws are unconstitutional and that the…

O'Rourke v. Dominion Voting Sys. Inc.

For example, on December 11, 2020, the United States Supreme Court denied the State of Texas' attempt to file…