From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tetro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 17, 1991
581 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-3001.

July 17, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Arthur J. Franza, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tanja Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Douglas J. Glaid, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


AFFIRMED. However, we remand so the judgment can be corrected. The state concedes that the written sentences do not conform to the trial judge's oral pronouncements at sentencing. Avery v. State, 543 So.2d 296 (Fla. 5th DCA), appeal dismissed, 553 So.2d 1164 (1989) (when written orders are inconsistent with oral pronouncements made at sentencing, the oral pronouncements prevail). The written judgment should be corrected to reflect that as to counts II, III and IV the trial judge imposed sentences of forty years in prison concurrent with each other, but consecutive to the sentence imposed on count I.

HERSEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tetro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 17, 1991
581 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Tetro v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN TETRO, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 17, 1991

Citations

581 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Woodberry v. State

However, the written sentencing orders (entered after jury verdict of guilty) pertaining to Counts I through…

Thomas v. State

Accordingly, the court's later correction in August of 1984 of the written sentence to conform to its oral…