From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Teemac v. Frito Lay, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 16, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-2908-G (BF) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 16, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-2908-G (BF)

07-16-2015

HANDY TEEMAC, Plaintiff, v. FRITO LAY, INC., ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated June 29, 2015, the court finds that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are correct, and they are accepted as the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the court.

It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. July 16, 2015.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Teemac v. Frito Lay, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 16, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-2908-G (BF) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Teemac v. Frito Lay, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HANDY TEEMAC, Plaintiff, v. FRITO LAY, INC., ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 16, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-2908-G (BF) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 16, 2015)

Citing Cases

Grost v. United States

"In order to prove intentional infliction of emotional distress, [a plaintiff] must show that [a defendant]…