From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

T.E.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 3, 1993
627 So. 2d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-2200.

December 3, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Thomas S. Kirk, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James T. Cook, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Appellant's adjudication of delinquency for possession of drug paraphernalia is reversed. The alleged paraphernalia tested negative for any controlled substance and the record is devoid of any evidence that appellant possessed it with intent to use it for the illegal purposes set forth in section 893.147(1), Florida Statutes (1991).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

T.E.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 3, 1993
627 So. 2d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

T.E.D. v. State

Case Details

Full title:T.E.D., III, A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 3, 1993

Citations

627 So. 2d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Nixon v. State

The presence of even a minuscule quantity of drug residue is sufficient circumstantial evidence to prove the…

Goodroe v. State

In Steele v. State, 561 So.2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), the first district held that the evidence supported…