From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Teban v. Kingswood Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 24, 1995
220 A.D.2d 316 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 24, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.).


As the IAS Court correctly observed, the amendment to Executive Law § 297 (9), providing that a complaint filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) with the State Division of Human Rights was not to be deemed an election of an administrative remedy, applies only to complaints filed with the EEOC on or after July 15, 1991 (L 1991, ch 342, § 2). Since plaintiff filed with the EEOC before July 15, 1991, the amendment does not apply, and the filing was properly deemed to bar State court remedies ( Scott v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., 147 A.D.2d 33, 38, lv dismissed 75 N.Y.2d 764).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Rubin, Ross, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Teban v. Kingswood Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 24, 1995
220 A.D.2d 316 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Teban v. Kingswood Management Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MIRCEA TEBAN, Appellant, v. KINGSWOOD MANAGEMENT CORP., Respondent, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 24, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 316 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 6

Citing Cases

Krause v. Kelehan

Accordingly, a discrimination complaint filed with the EEOC that the EEOC then cross-files with DHR "is not…