From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taukitoku v. Filson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 1, 2017
Case No. 3:16-cv-00762-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jun. 1, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 3:16-cv-00762-HDM-WGC

06-01-2017

SAMISONI TAUKITOKU, Petitioner, v. FILSON, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

This action is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by a Nevada state prisoner.

Petitioner has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1). Based on the information regarding petitioner's financial status, the Court finds that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis should be granted.

Petitioner has filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 1-2). Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(2)(B), the district court has discretion to appoint counsel when it determines that the "interests of justice" require representation in a habeas corpus case. Petitioner has no constitutional right to appointed counsel in a federal habeas corpus proceeding. Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Bonin v. Vasquez, 999 F.2d 425, 428 (9th Cir. 1993). The decision to appoint counsel is within the Court's discretion. Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1023 (1987); Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 838 (1984). However, counsel must be appointed if the complexities of the case are such that denial of counsel would amount to a denial of due process. See Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196 (balancing the complexities of the issues with a consideration of the severity of petitioner's penalty).

The federal habeas petition submitted in this action includes many claims, the contents of which suggest that it may be a relatively complex action. In the underlying state criminal case, petitioner was convicted of multiple counts of first degree murder and was sentenced to imprisonment for life without the possibility of parole. The Court grants petitioner's motion for the appointment of counsel.

Therefore, the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) shall be appointed to represent petitioner. If the FPD is unable to represent petitioner, due to a conflict of interest or other reason, then alternate counsel for petitioner shall be located, and the Court will enter a separate order appointing such alternate counsel. In either case, counsel will represent petitioner in all future federal proceedings relating to this matter (including subsequent actions) and appeals therefrom, unless allowed to withdraw.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED. The pro se petition SHALL BE FILED by the Clerk of Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-2) SHALL BE FILED by the Clerk of Court and is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender is appointed to represent petitioner.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) a copy of this order, together with a copy of the pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. The FPD shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to undertake direct representation of petitioner or to indicate to the Court its inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL add Attorney General Adam Paul Laxalt to the CM/ECF docket sheet and serve respondents with a copy of this order. Respondents' counsel SHALL ENTER a notice of appearance herein within ten (10) days of entry of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL SEND a copy of this order to the CJA Coordinator.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after counsel has appeared for petitioner in this case, the Court will issue a scheduling order, which will, among other things, set a deadline for the filing of a first amended petition.

DATED this 1st day of June, 2017.

/s/_________

HOWARD D. McKIBBEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Taukitoku v. Filson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 1, 2017
Case No. 3:16-cv-00762-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jun. 1, 2017)
Case details for

Taukitoku v. Filson

Case Details

Full title:SAMISONI TAUKITOKU, Petitioner, v. FILSON, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 1, 2017

Citations

Case No. 3:16-cv-00762-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jun. 1, 2017)