From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tarzia v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
May 3, 1999
734 A.2d 569 (Conn. 1999)

Opinion

Decided May 3, 1999


The named defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 136 (AC 16676), is denied.

CALLAHAN, C.J., and McDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

James F. Mullen, in support of the petition.


Summaries of

Tarzia v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
May 3, 1999
734 A.2d 569 (Conn. 1999)
Case details for

Tarzia v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS TARZIA v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: May 3, 1999

Citations

734 A.2d 569 (Conn. 1999)
734 A.2d 569

Citing Cases

Tarzia v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

We granted Heyman's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issues: (1) "Did the…

Oak River Company v. Ferreri

To prevail in an action for negligence, plaintiff must establish that defendants owed it a duty of care and…