From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tarawneh v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 13, 1991
588 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

In Tarawneh our sister court held that, under similar circumstances, the trial court should have used a category 9 scoresheet. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(c), category 9 is used for any felony offense not otherwise classified into a specific offense category.

Summary of this case from Hayles v. State

Opinion

No. 91-0616.

September 25, 1991. Rehearing, Clarification and Certification Denied December 13, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, John A. Frusciante, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a final order which partially denied a motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand for resentencing with an appropriate sentencing scoresheet.

Appellant correctly notes that on the face of the Category 1 scoresheet, for murder and manslaughter, there is an exception for capital murder pursuant to section 782.04(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989). Appellant was convicted of four inchoate offenses, solicitation to commit first degree murder and three counts of conspiracy to commit first degree murder. He looks to the committee notes to rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which state the following:

(c) Only one category is proper in any particular case. Category 9, "All Other Felony Offenses," should be used only when the primary offense at conviction is not included in another, more specific category. The guidelines do not apply to capital felonies.

Inchoate offenses are included within the category of the offense attempted, solicited, or conspired to, as modified by Ch. 777. . . .

Appellant persuasively argues that while the Category 1 scoresheet would be appropriate for murder or manslaughter other than capital murder, its express exclusion of capital murder makes use of the scoresheet error. Since Category 1 was not applicable, and as his offenses do not fall under any other express category, the only remaining category applicable is Category 9, designated for "all other felony offenses." See Vance v. State, 565 So.2d 915 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. dismissed, 574 So.2d 144 (Fla. 1990); Robertson v. State, 559 So.2d 352 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); State v. Hutcheson, 501 So.2d 190 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tarawneh v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 13, 1991
588 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

In Tarawneh our sister court held that, under similar circumstances, the trial court should have used a category 9 scoresheet. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(c), category 9 is used for any felony offense not otherwise classified into a specific offense category.

Summary of this case from Hayles v. State

In Tarawneh v. State, 588 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), Tarawneh was convicted of four inchoate offenses, solicitation to commit first degree murder and three counts of conspiracy to commit first degree murder.

Summary of this case from Orr v. State
Case details for

Tarawneh v. State

Case Details

Full title:SAUD TARAWNEH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 13, 1991

Citations

588 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Hayles v. State

Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.988(a). Appellant, relying upon Tarawneh v. State, 588 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), urges…

Roth v. State

PER CURIAM. We have for review Roth v. State, 601 So.2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on certified conflict…