From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Talton v. Warden

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 13, 1994
636 A.2d 850 (Conn. 1994)

Opinion

(14874)

Decided January 13, 1994


The petitioner Napier Talton's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 33 Conn. App. 171 (AC 11055), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that, based on the record of the habeas proceeding, the habeas court properly determined that the recantation testimony of the victim-witness was not credible?

"2. If the recantation testimony of the victim-witness was credible, did the Appellate Court properly decline to find that the appellant's due process rights were violated?

"3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the appellant failed to establish that he was fatally prejudiced by his trial counsel's arguably deficient performance and therefore that he was not denied his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel?"


James Moreno, special public defender, in support of the petition.

John A. East III, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

Talton v. Warden

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 13, 1994
636 A.2d 850 (Conn. 1994)
Case details for

Talton v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:NAPIER TALTON v. WARDEN, STATE PRISON

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 13, 1994

Citations

636 A.2d 850 (Conn. 1994)
228 Conn. 919

Citing Cases

Talton v. Warden

We granted certification to appeal, limited to the following questions: "1. Did the Appellate Court correctly…

Johnson v. State

We note that the recantation testimony in Talton was in the context of a habeas corpus proceeding and not a…