From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TAKAYAMA v. ZERA

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Mar 18, 2010
226 P.3d 522 (Haw. Ct. App. 2010)

Summary

holding that even if denial of summary judgment was erroneous, error was harmless because appellant prevailed at trial and did not allege any harm from denial of summary judgment

Summary of this case from Hawaiian Ass'n of Seventh-Day Adventists, Non-Profit Corp. v. Wong

Opinion

No. 27900.

March 18, 2010.


Summary Dispositional Orders Affirmed.


Summaries of

TAKAYAMA v. ZERA

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Mar 18, 2010
226 P.3d 522 (Haw. Ct. App. 2010)

holding that even if denial of summary judgment was erroneous, error was harmless because appellant prevailed at trial and did not allege any harm from denial of summary judgment

Summary of this case from Hawaiian Ass'n of Seventh-Day Adventists, Non-Profit Corp. v. Wong
Case details for

TAKAYAMA v. ZERA

Case Details

Full title:Takayama v. Zera

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii

Date published: Mar 18, 2010

Citations

226 P.3d 522 (Haw. Ct. App. 2010)
122 Haw. 352

Citing Cases

Hawaiian Ass'n of Seventh-Day Adventists, Non-Profit Corp. v. Wong

Therefore, even if the Circuit Court erred by not granting Wong's motion for partial summary judgment, such…

Barber v. Ohana Military Cmtys., LLC

B. Leases for Rental Property Are Not "Goods or "Services" Pursuant to Haw. Rev. Stat. § 480Hawaii state…