From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Szuch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 14, 2001
780 So. 2d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 4D99-3440.

Opinion filed March 14, 2001.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barry E. Goldstein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 95-5360 CF10A.

Kimberly S. Daise of Kimberly S. Daise, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The order denying appellant's post-conviction "Motion for Clarification of Applicability of 775.21" is hereby affirmed. Affirmance is without prejudice to appellant to file a separate civil suit seeking injunctive or declaratory relief from his sexual predator designation and the inclusion of information about his 1993 offenses on the Florida Department of Law Enforcement website. See, Connor v. State, 773 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Trovillo v. Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement, 762 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

DELL, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Szuch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 14, 2001
780 So. 2d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Szuch v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN SZUCH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 14, 2001

Citations

780 So. 2d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Paccione v. State

Affirmed. See Szuch v. State, 780 So.2d 290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ.,…

King v. State

To avoid any confusion, we explain that a sexual predator designation (1) may be imposed or modified after…