From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swyers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 9, 1976
334 So. 2d 278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 75-1204.

May 18, 1976. Rehearing Denied July 9, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Jack Turner, J.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Paul Morris, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., HENDRY, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.


The appellant Robert Preston Swyers was found guilty by a jury of involuntary sexual battery, false imprisonment and kidnapping, and of unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. He was so adjudged, and was sentenced to imprisonment for life on the first crime, for fifteen years for the second crime and for five years on the third crime, with provision for the sentences to be served concurrently.

We find that the appellant has not demonstrated reversible error, and affirm. The evidence of guilt was fulsome, if not overwhelming. The trial court did not commit error in denying the defendant's motions for mistrial based on the statements made by the prosecutor in argument. Morris v. State, 100 Fla. 850, 130 So. 582; Gray v. State, 42 Fla. 174, 28 So. 53; Clinton v. State, 56 Fla. 57, 47 So. 389; State v. Jones, Fla. 1967, 204 So.2d 515.

The trial court sustained defendant's objection to the prosecution's question to a doctor who examined the victim, as to whether in taking a history from the victim he believed she was not telling the truth. The question as reframed was whether the doctor found anything the victim told him in taking the history from her was not consistent. With the meaning of the initial question thus explained, no harmful error resulted, and denial of a motion for mistrial by the defendant was proper.

Appellant contends a separate sentence could not be imposed for the crime of possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense, because that crime arose from the same transaction which involved the other offenses. The contention is without merit. Estevez v. State, Fla. 1975, 313 So.2d 692; Jenkins v. Wainwright, Fla. 1975, 322 So.2d 477.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Swyers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 9, 1976
334 So. 2d 278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Swyers v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT SWYERS, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 9, 1976

Citations

334 So. 2d 278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Sellars v. State

We agree and reverse. Only one sentence may be imposed for the offense of robbery and use of a firearm during…

Mills v. State

See also In the Matter of the Use by the Trial Courts of the Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases…