From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sundstrom v. Collier County

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 9, 1980
385 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Summary

In Sundstrom v. Collier County, 385 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), the owner of real property obtained a building permit and spent money to commence work on the project.

Summary of this case from Palazzo v. Ft. Ldrdle

Opinion

No. 79-2222.

July 9, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Collier County, Charles T. Carlton, J.

Stephen M. Maher of Carroll, McPeak, Bolesky Schryver, Naples, for appellant.

Anthony P. Pires, Jr., Asst. Collier County Atty., Naples, for appellees.


This is an appeal from an order dismissing a petition for mandamus with prejudice. Appellant contends that the dismissal should have been without prejudice. We agree.

Appellant, as trustee, owned certain real property in Collier County, Florida on which he intended to construct a marina-boatel. He obtained a building permit, and ostensibly relying thereon, expended sums of money to construct the facility. Subsequently, the county zoning director caused a stop-work order to be issued on the project. Appellant, pursuant to the Collier County Code, Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, (Code) appealed the decision of the zoning director to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners sitting as the Board of Zoning Appeals. The board upheld the zoning director's order and appellant filed a petition for a writ of mandamus forty-four days after the board's decision. The Code provides review of a decision of the zoning board is to be by petition for certiorari filed within thirty days of the board's decision. The circuit court dismissed appellant's petition with prejudice on the grounds that appellant had failed to file a timely petition for certiorari, and mandamus could not be used to cure this effect.

The lower court correctly dismissed the petition for mandamus. Mandamus will not issue to relieve litigants of the consequences of failing to file in time for other appropriate relief. Shevin v. Public Service Commission, 333 So.2d 9 (Fla. 1976). However, the dismissal should have been without prejudice to allow appellant an opportunity to attempt to state a cause of action in equity for equitable estoppel, declaratory relief, or an injunction. Sunshores, Inc. v. County of Pinellas, 351 So.2d 758 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). Accordingly, the order is affirmed, but the case is remanded with instructions to delete the words "with prejudice".

GRIMES, Acting C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sundstrom v. Collier County

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 9, 1980
385 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

In Sundstrom v. Collier County, 385 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), the owner of real property obtained a building permit and spent money to commence work on the project.

Summary of this case from Palazzo v. Ft. Ldrdle
Case details for

Sundstrom v. Collier County

Case Details

Full title:WALDRON L. SUNDSTROM, TRUSTEE, APPELLANT, v. COLLIER COUNTY, A POLITICAL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 9, 1980

Citations

385 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Palazzo v. Ft. Ldrdle

Consistent with these principles, there are Florida cases suggesting that a civil suit will lie against a…

Hernando Co. v. Leisure Hills, Inc.

Further, the County did not raise this issue when it responded to the complaint in 1985. Prior to Snyder,…