From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sun Bank of Miami v. M.H.D. Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 10, 1985
474 So. 2d 304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-2484.

July 16, 1985. Rehearing Denied September 10, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Joseph J. Gersten, J.

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick Strickroot and Nathan D. Clark, Miami, for appellant.

Kenneth S. Sandler, Hollywood, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.


The appellee brought a suit for the return of monies illegally extracted by the appellant bank in the form of usury. The cause was tried by a jury, which rendered upon special interrogatory a verdict, finding no usury yet it awarded one-half the amount sought as damages. We find this error and reverse the award of damages. There is no evidence to support the award after the adverse finding by the jury on the usury issue. Cloutier v. Central Contracting, Inc., 418 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Tidwell v. Toca, 362 So.2d 85 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

We have examined the points urged for reversal on the cross appeal and find no merit therein. For the reasons above stated the final judgment under review be and the same is hereby reversed.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Sun Bank of Miami v. M.H.D. Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 10, 1985
474 So. 2d 304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Sun Bank of Miami v. M.H.D. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SUN BANK OF MIAMI, APPELLANT, v. M.H.D. CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 10, 1985

Citations

474 So. 2d 304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)