From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sukhram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jul 1, 2015
175 So. 3d 806 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 2D15–412.

07-01-2015

Roopesh SUKHRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Roopesh Sukhram, pro se.


Roopesh Sukhram, pro se.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Santos v. State, 380 So.2d 1284 (Fla.1980) ; Doby v. State, 25 So.3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Shortridge v. State, 884 So.2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; Hinson v. State, 57 So.3d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) ; McCutcheon v. State, 44 So.3d 156 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) ; Brown v. State, 10 So.3d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) ; Harris v. State, 789 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

KHOUZAM, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Sukhram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jul 1, 2015
175 So. 3d 806 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Sukhram v. State

Case Details

Full title:Roopesh SUKHRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Jul 1, 2015

Citations

175 So. 3d 806 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)