From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 10, 2018
2017-2541 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2018)

Opinion

2017-2541

12-10-2018

STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER PUERTO RICO, LTD., STRYKER SALES CORPORATION, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER SURGICAL, INC., Defendants-Appellants

SHARON HWANG, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by DEBORAH LAUGHTON, STEPHANIE SAMZ. SETH P. WAXMAN, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by THOMAS SAUNDERS; THOMAS GREGORY SPRANKLING, Palo Alto, CA.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan in No. 1:10-cv-01223-RJJ, Judge Robert J. Jonker.

JUDGMENT

SHARON HWANG, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by DEBORAH LAUGHTON, STEPHANIE SAMZ. SETH P. WAXMAN, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by THOMAS SAUNDERS; THOMAS GREGORY SPRANKLING, Palo Alto, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, O'MALLEY and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 10, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 10, 2018
2017-2541 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2018)
Case details for

Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER PUERTO RICO, LTD., STRYKER SALES CORPORATION…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 10, 2018

Citations

2017-2541 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2018)

Citing Cases

Siemens Mobility, Inc. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Techs. Corp.

However, in assessing whether enhancement is appropriate, the Court may consider whether there was evidence…