From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Streu v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
May 3, 2005
161 S.W.3d 382 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

In Streu v. State, 161 S.W.3d 382 (Mo.App. 2005), this court affirmed the motion court's order, denying the appellant's Rule 29.15 motion.

Summary of this case from Streu v. State

Opinion

No. WD 63504.

March 15, 2005. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 3, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henry County; Stephen K. Griffin, Judge.

Rebecca L. Kurz, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.

Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., SMART, J. and EDWIN H. SMITH, C.J.


ORDER


Movant was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. He now seeks post-conviction relief, claiming that his trial counsel was ineffective for not making proper objections to portions of the State's closing argument, which allegedly bolstered or vouched for the veracity of its key witness. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Streu v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
May 3, 2005
161 S.W.3d 382 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

In Streu v. State, 161 S.W.3d 382 (Mo.App. 2005), this court affirmed the motion court's order, denying the appellant's Rule 29.15 motion.

Summary of this case from Streu v. State
Case details for

Streu v. State

Case Details

Full title:Larry C. STREU, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: May 3, 2005

Citations

161 S.W.3d 382 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Streu v. State

On appeal, appellate counsel did not raise a claim of abandonment by post-conviction counsel. In Streu v.…

Streu v. Dormire

The circuit court denied Streu's Rule 29.15 motion, and the court of appeals issued its mandate affirming the…