From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

StreetSpace, Inc. v. Google Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 17, 2012
No. C 11-04574 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2012)

Opinion

No. C 11-04574 WHA

09-17-2012

STREETSPACE, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC.; ADMOB, INC.; APPLE INC.; QUATTRO WIRELESS, INC.; NOKIA CORPORATION; NOKIA INC.; NAVTEQ CORPORATION; MILLENNIAL MEDIA, INC.; JUMPTAP, INC., Defendants.


NOTICE RE MISJOINDER RESPONSES

The undersigned has reviewed the parties' responses to the order to show cause regarding misjoinder. Per defendants' request, because the PTO reexamination of the patent-in-suit is near conclusion with all claims currently rejected, the undersigned will postpone ruling on the issue of misjoinder for judicial efficiency. See Gould v. Control Laser Corp., 705 F.2d 1340, 1342 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (holding that one purpose of reexamination is to eliminate the issue of invalidity when asserted claims are canceled). The issue of whether to maintain the stay currently in place may be revisited at the case management conference, currently scheduled for October 11, 2012. By that time, perhaps the reexamination will have concluded.

_______________

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

StreetSpace, Inc. v. Google Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 17, 2012
No. C 11-04574 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2012)
Case details for

StreetSpace, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STREETSPACE, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC.; ADMOB, INC.; APPLE INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 17, 2012

Citations

No. C 11-04574 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2012)