From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Straughn v. Thompson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 7, 1978
354 So. 2d 948 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. DD-416.

February 7, 1978.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Johns County, E.L. Eastmoore, J.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Joseph C. Mellichamp, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Willard Howatt, St. Augustine, for appellants.

Hamilton D. Upchurch, St. Augustine, for appellees.


This cause is before us on appeal from the Order of the Circuit Court, St. Johns County, holding invalid the tax assessor's correction, under Florida Statute § 197.056, of a "computer error" in Appellee's tax bill which omitted a zero from the stated assessed value of the improvements on the property. After Appellee's payment of the tax for 1974, the error was discovered and additional taxes were back-assessed.

We find that the action of the tax assessor was valid under the holdings of this Court and of the Florida Supreme Court in Mills v. Korash, 249 So.2d 765 (1st DCA 1971), certiorari discharged, 263 So.2d 579 (Fla. 1972).

Accordingly, the judgment below is REVERSED.

SMITH, Acting C.J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Straughn v. Thompson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 7, 1978
354 So. 2d 948 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Straughn v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:J. ED STRAUGHN, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. PIERRE D. THOMPSON ET AL.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 7, 1978

Citations

354 So. 2d 948 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Krosschell

In 1978, the First District concluded that a computer error that omitted a zero in the property owner's tax…

Robbins v. First National Bank

Contrary to the conclusion reached by the trial court and the Property Appraisal Adjustment Board, we hold…