From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strange v. Dep't of Corr.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 29, 2021
333 So. 3d 250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-1273

12-29-2021

Steve A. STRANGE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Steve A. Strange, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gecelyne S. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Steve A. Strange, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gecelyne S. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

Rowe, C.J., and Osterhaus and Winokur, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Strange v. Dep't of Corr.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 29, 2021
333 So. 3d 250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Strange v. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Steve A. STRANGE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Dec 29, 2021

Citations

333 So. 3d 250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)