From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stover v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Jul 17, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-02642 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 17, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-02642

07-17-2018

MATTHEW STEPHEN STOVER, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On May 1, 2017, the Plaintiff filed his Complaint (Document 2) in this matter seeking review of the final decision of the Commission of Social Security denying the Plaintiff's application for benefits. By Standing Order (Document 3) entered on May 3, 2017, the action was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Subsequently, by Order (Document 8) entered on May 15, 2017, the referral was transferred to the Honorable Dwane L. Tinsley, United States Magistrate Judge.

On June 27, 2018, Magistrate Tinsley Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 11) wherein it is recommended that the Plaintiff's Complaint (Document 2) be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute, and that this matter be removed from the Court's docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by July 16, 2018.

Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); see also Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983) (holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Plaintiff's Complaint (Document 2) be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute, and that this matter be REMOVED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Magistrate Judge Tinsley, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: July 17, 2018

/s/_________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

Stover v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Jul 17, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-02642 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 17, 2018)
Case details for

Stover v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW STEPHEN STOVER, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION

Date published: Jul 17, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-02642 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 17, 2018)