From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stilling v. Skankey

Supreme Court of Utah
Nov 27, 1989
784 P.2d 144 (Utah 1989)

Opinion

No. 880197.

November 27, 1989.

Third District, Salt Lake County; Richard H. Moffat, Judge.

John D. Parken and Marcella L. Keck, Salt Lake City, for defendant, cross-claimant, and appellant.

Fred R. Silvester, Charles P. Sampson, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff.

Mark S. Gustavson and Charles A. Schultz, Salt Lake City, for cross-claim defendants and appellees.


Appellant appeals from an order of the trial court, dismissing with prejudice his cross-claim for indemnity against appellees on the ground that the seven-year statute of repose, Utah Code Ann. § 78-12-25.5 (1987), (amended 1988), cut off appellant's right of action against the architects and engineers from whom appellant sought indemnification in a tort claim.

In Horton v. Goldminer's Daughter, 785 P.2d 1087 (Utah 1989) and Sun Valley Water Beds of Utah v. Herm Hughes Son, Inc., 782 P.2d 188 (Utah 1989), this Court held that the Utah architects and builders statute of repose is unconstitutional under the open courts provision of article I, section 11 of the Utah Constitution.

Those two cases are dispositive here, and the case is remanded to the trial court for a trial on the merits of appellant's cross-claim.


Summaries of

Stilling v. Skankey

Supreme Court of Utah
Nov 27, 1989
784 P.2d 144 (Utah 1989)
Case details for

Stilling v. Skankey

Case Details

Full title:KAREN STILLING, PLAINTIFF, v. RICHARD L. SKANKEY, DBA OLYMPUS HILLS MALL…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Nov 27, 1989

Citations

784 P.2d 144 (Utah 1989)

Citing Cases

Wyoming Workers' Comp. v. Halstead

A perspective of constitutionality which initially developed a number of years ago when statutes of repose…

Wrolstad v. Industrial Com'n of Utah

In both cases, a statute of repose precluded recovery before the injured person was in a position to exercise…